<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Mon, 28 May 2012 12:56:13 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>News You Can Use</title><subtitle>News You Can Use</subtitle><id>http://www.soundadvicemanagement.com/news2011/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.soundadvicemanagement.com/news2011/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.soundadvicemanagement.com/news2011/atom.xml"/><updated>2011-10-27T19:38:04Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Important notice from NARAS RE: Sirius</title><id>http://www.soundadvicemanagement.com/news2011/2011/10/27/important-notice-from-naras-re-sirius.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.soundadvicemanagement.com/news2011/2011/10/27/important-notice-from-naras-re-sirius.html"/><author><name>Kimball</name></author><published>2011-10-27T19:36:51Z</published><updated>2011-10-27T19:36:51Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Dear Recording Academy Member:</p>
<p>It has come to our attention that satellite broadcaster Sirius/XM is seeking to bypass the standard system of paying royalties.&nbsp; If they are allowed to do so, it will likely result in substantially reduced payments to artists and producers, a lowering of the value of performance royalties, and unnecessary conflict between artists and their labels.</p>
<p><span>What&rsquo;s the&nbsp;issue:<span>&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p>Currently, satellite radio pays sound recording performance royalties to the nonprofit collective&nbsp;SoundExchange, which in turn pays 50% to the artists on the recording and 50% to the copyright owner (usually a record label).&nbsp;&nbsp;SoundExchangepays the artists the full 50%, even if the artist has&nbsp;unrecouped&nbsp;royalty balances, and also pays producers their share as directed by the artist.&nbsp; The system has resulted in an important new income stream for creators.</p>
<p>Sirius is now seeking to use the option of direct licensing with certain independent labels instead of using the system created by Congress that ensures fair payment to all parties.&nbsp; Artists should be concerned about direct licensing; 100% of the royalties would be paid to the record label which in turn may pay artists at a lower rate, subject to recoupment.&nbsp; And labels should be concerned as well; the lower rate being offered could have the effect of lowering the value of performance royalties to all parties.</p>
<p>What you can do:</p>
<p><em>If you are an artist signed to the independent label&hellip;</em></p>
<p>You can call your label today and request that it not direct license your recordings.&nbsp; In the interest of fairness and transparency, your label should continue to license through&nbsp;SoundExchange.</p>
<p><em>If you own or manage an independent label&hellip;</em></p>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
<p>It is in your interest to refrain from direct licensing.&nbsp; While Sirius may be offering positive terms, the long-term effect of accepting a rate lower than the compulsory rate could be to reduce rates overall in the future.&nbsp; Creating downward pressure on the value of music may be good for Sirius/XM, but it&rsquo;s bad for artists and labels.&nbsp; Please see the following statement from the American Association of Independent Music:&nbsp;http://a2im.org/2011/08/09/statutory-rates-versus-direct-licenses-for-digital-music-streaming/</p>
<p>Thank you for considering this important matter to further our goals of ensuring creators&nbsp;are&nbsp;compensated fairly and the value of music is protected.</p>
<p>Kind regards,&nbsp;</p>
<p>Neil&nbsp;Portnow</p>
<p>President/CEO</p>
<p>The Recording Academy</p>]]></content></entry></feed>
